[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
. Rawls is Given Two Awards for Book on Justice Theory, TheHarvard Crimson, December 7, 1972, www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=245388.Ackerman, Bruce, Political Liberalisms, The Journal of Philosophy, 91(1994).Anderson, Elizabeth, What is the Point of Equality? Ethics, 109 (1999).Arneson, Richard, Against Complex Equality in Pluralism, Justice, andEquality, David Miller and Michael Walzer, eds.(Oxford UniversityPress, 1995).Barber, Benjamin, The Conquest of Politics (Princeton University Press, 1988).Barry, Brian, Political Argument after Twenty-Five Years: An Introductionto the Reissue in Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction(University of California Press, 1990).Baynes, Kenneth, Ethos and Institutions: On the Site of Distributive Jus-tice, Journal of Social Philosophy, 37 (2006).Becker, Lawrence, Against the Supposed Difference between Historicaland End-State Theories, Philosophical Studies, 41 (1982).Berlin, Isaiah, Does Political Theory Still Exist? in Laslett and Runciman,Philosophy, Politics and Society (second series). Bibliography 203Brandt, Richard, A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford UniversityPress, 1979).Clark, Barry and Herbert Gintis, Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7 (1978).Cohen, G.A., Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: How PatternsPreserve Liberty [1977] in Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality(Cambridge University Press, 1995). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, Ethics, 99 (1989). Incentives, Inequality, and Community, The Tanner Lectures on HumanValues, 13, Grethe Peterson, ed.(University of Utah Press, 1992).If You re an Egalitarian, How Come You re So Rich? (Harvard UniversityPress, 2000). Expensive Taste Rides Again in Dworkin and His Critics, Justine Burley,ed.(Blackwell, 2004).Cohen, Joshua, Book Review of Spheres of Justice, The Journal of Philosophy,83 (1986). Democratic Equality, Ethics, 99 (1989). Taking People as They Are? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (2001). For a Democratic Society in Freeman, The Cambridge Companion toRawls. The Importance of Philosophy: Reflections on John Rawls, SouthAfrican Journal of Philosophy, 32 (2004).Cohen, Marshall, Review of A Theory of Justice, New York Times BookReview, July 16, 1972.Dewey, John, The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy [1917] in TheEssential Dewey, vol.i, Larry Hickman and Thomas Alexander, eds.(Indiana University Press, 1998). Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder [1939] inThe Philosophyof John Dewey, Paul Schilpp and Lewis Hahn, eds., 3rd edn.(OpenCourt, 1989).Dworkin, Ronald, John Rawls, The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 11(2003).Eberle, Christopher, Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2002).Elster, Jon, Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and NecessaryBurdens (Russell Sage Foundation, 1992).English, Jane, Justice between Generations, Philosophical Studies, 31 (1977).Estlund, David, Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen s Critiqueof Rawls, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (1998).Freeman, Samuel, Congruence and the Good of Justice in Freeman, Justiceand the Social Contract. Rawls and Luck Egalitarianism in Freeman, Justice and the SocialContract. 204 Bibliography Frontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach vs.Contractarianism, Texas Law Review, 85 (2006).Fried, Barbara, Wilt Chamberlain Revisited: Nozick s Justice in Transferand the Problem of Market-Based Distribution, Philosophy and PublicAffairs, 24 (1995).Galston, William, Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Lib-eral State (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Gauthier, David, Moral by Agreement (Oxford University Press, 1986).Gray, John, Contractarian Method, Private Property and the Market Econ-omy in Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy (Routledge, 1989).Gregory, Eric, Before the Original Position: The Neo-Orthodox Theologyof the Young John Rawls, Journal of Religious Ethics, 35 (2007).Habermas, Jürgen, Life-Forms, Morality and the Task of the Philosopher [1984] in Autonomy and Solidarity, rev.edn., Peter Dews, ed.(Verso,1992).Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Christian Lenhardt andShierry Weber Nicholsen, trans.(MIT Press, 1990).Hampton, Jean, Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Con-tract Theory? Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980).Hare, R.M., Rawls Theory of Justice [1973] in Daniels, Reading Rawls. Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism in Utilitarianism and Beyond,Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, eds.(Cambridge University Press,1982).Harsanyi, John, Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality?A Critique of John Rawls s Theory [1975] in Essays on Ethics, SocialBehavior, and Scientific Explanation (D.Reidel, 1976).Hart, H.L.A., Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority [1973] inDaniels, ReadingRawls. Between Utility and Rights [1979] inEssays in Jurisprudence and Philos-ophy (Oxford University Press, 1983).Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals [1797], Mary Gregor, trans.(Cambridge University Press, 1996).Kearns, Deborah, A Theory of Justice and Love Rawls on the Family, Politics, 16 (1987).Korsgaard, Christine, The Reasons We Can Share [1993] in Creating theKingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]